I
found this video extremely hard to follow, primarily because it is so old and
also because it was British. Although I
found this video very dated, it was very interesting to understand the mindset
and perspective of some forty years ago.
In some ways the concepts about technology, cameras, and art seemed very
similar to those today, and in other ways it seemed pretty foreign because of
the age gap. I find it interesting to
think that there used to be only one place at a time where you could see the
Mona Lisa or any other piece of art, but now I could look it up on my computer
or buy a print or postcard easily. The
camera and photographs are so integrated in everyday life it is hard to imagine
life without them.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Masters of Illusion
I thought the
Masters of Illusion video was very interesting.
I love art history so all of the references and anecdotes about famous
artists from the past were very entertaining to me. The part about linear perspective and how it was
developed and discovered was very thought provoking. I had never thought of perspective as
something that had to be discovered, I had always just taken this knowledge for
granted. I also never really thought
about artists as being sort of mathematicians and scientists like they are
portrayed in this video. Some of them,
such as Uccello, seem so dedicated to their craft its obsessive.
Errol Morris on Photography
On Photography
This
article by Susan Sontag describes photography in many different ways. I thought when she described photos as and
experience that has been captured made a lot of sense. When I’m on vacation I take hundreds of
photos because I try to record or capture all of the events that take
place. She also described photography as
a means of basically collecting the world.
You can collect the knowledge from the photos and literally hold
hundreds of photos in your hands at one time.
Another point that resonated with me was that photos seem to be
irrefutable evidence. Many times photos
or videos are what catches fugitives so this statement makes a lot of sense. Although photos seem to portray evidence and
fact, like Sontag says, it seems that photos interpret the reality like
paintings do because nothing that is just one image can accurately portray
reality.
The Photographers Eye
I
found this passage to be very interesting.
I am not really into photography so I have never researched or learned
very much about its history or thought much about its intricacies in general. I liked the part where the author compared
and contrasted painting and photography.
Being a painter myself I found the differences stated by the author to
be very revealing about the essence of both photography and painting or other
kinds of art. I also liked the part
where the author states that photos are more like symbols of reality not
stories or explanations. This statement
seems to embody the reality that photos are just one single frame and that is
all the information you can gain from them.
Camera Lucida
I
found this essay kind of hard to follow but the points that stuck out were very
powerful. The author talked about how a
photograph attests that something has existed, although with Photoshop and
other programs now you cant be 100% sure what you see is reality. One quality about photos that really connects
with me that this author talked about is how the photo makes you think and
wonder about all the circumstances, not just the one frame of reality that is
visible. Especially old photographs make
me wonder who the people are, what they are doing, and what is their
story. Photographs only give you enough
taste to spark your curiosity. The most
powerful part of this essay in my opinion was at the end when the author states
that photos are violent because they force you to see and accept their reality,
there can be no other interpretation than the one that is visible to you.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)